Bridging the Gap
Presenter: Dimas Muharam (SID: 202002544)
Focus: Data Governance & The Social Model of Disability
Background and Context
- Legal Mandate: Law No. 8/2016 (1% to 2% employment quota).
- Educational Disparity: Only 3.1% complete tertiary education.
- Employment Disparity: Nearly 70% to 78.27% trapped in the informal sector.
- Impact: Majority lack social protection and low-income brackets.
Systemic Data Fragmentation
- Policy Blindness: Acute information asymmetry across stakeholders.
- Institutional Silos: Disconnect between Universities, Employers, and Regulators.
- Bottleneck: Inability to standardize variables like 'Reasonable Accommodations'.
Framework & Intervention
- Intervention: Evaluation of disabilitas.com digital prototype.
- Philosophy: Researcher-led innovation & Accessibility by Design.
- Variables: Standardizing Assistive Technologies & Study Relevance.
Research Questions & Objectives
- RQ1: How does data fragmentation obstruct transition policies?
- RQ2: Prototype design vs. stakeholder informational needs?
- RQ3: Policy implications for national monitoring infrastructure?
Methodology
- Design: Qualitative Case Study with Prototype Validation.
- Lens: Realist Evaluation (Context-Mechanism-Outcome).
- Target: 4 Stakeholder Groups via Zoom Interviews & UAT.
- Analysis: Framework Analysis (Efficiency, Equity, Accessibility).
Ethics & Policy Contribution
- Ethics: BSA Guidelines & Situated Ethics of Care.
- Contribution: A roadmap for national Data Governance.
- Goal: Transitioning from Charity to a Rights-Based, Data-Driven Ecosystem.